From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Congdon v. United States

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 31, 2011
Case No. 4:09-CV-289 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:09-CV-289

08-31-2011

SAMUEL R.H. CONGDON v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 11, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant United States of America's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #28) should be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant United States of America's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #28) is DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Congdon v. United States

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 31, 2011
Case No. 4:09-CV-289 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Congdon v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL R.H. CONGDON v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:09-CV-289 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Bittner

Reasonable cause relief is generally granted when the taxpayer exercises ordinary business care and prudence…