From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Condon v. Arata, Post

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1951
96 N.E.2d 890 (N.Y. 1951)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Condon v. Arata (302 N.Y. 579) it could have been found as a fact, and so it was argued in the Court of Appeals, that the fence upon which plaintiff was hurt, which extended to a public sidewalk, was for the special benefit of the owner of the land.

Summary of this case from Allen v. Weiss
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued November 30, 1950

Decided January 11, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, NATHAN, J.

William L. Shumate and Chester E. Barrett for appellant.

A.L. Sainer, Milton E. Haft and Harry B. Frank for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.

Summaries of

Condon v. Arata, Post

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 11, 1951
96 N.E.2d 890 (N.Y. 1951)

In Condon v. Arata (302 N.Y. 579) it could have been found as a fact, and so it was argued in the Court of Appeals, that the fence upon which plaintiff was hurt, which extended to a public sidewalk, was for the special benefit of the owner of the land.

Summary of this case from Allen v. Weiss
Case details for

Condon v. Arata, Post

Case Details

Full title:IDA CONDON, Respondent, v. MAE ARATA et al., Defendants, and DOROTHY I…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 11, 1951

Citations

96 N.E.2d 890 (N.Y. 1951)
96 N.E.2d 890

Citing Cases

Weiser v. City of New York

The findings of fact are affirmed. Appeals from original judgment dismissed, without costs. Ordinarily, an…

Moore v. Suburban Fuel Oil Service, Inc.

" Moreover, the learned trial court charged that this was a sidewalk owned by the City of New York and…

5 Citing Cases