From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Concering the Application for Water Rights

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
May 19, 2003
69 P.3d 1028 (Colo. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 02SA224 — Case No. 02SA226.

May 19, 2003.

Affrimed by Operation of Law.

Ken Salazar, Attorney General Susan S. Schneider, Assistant Attorney General Natural Resources and Environment Section Denver, Colorado Attorneys for The State Engineer; Division Engineer for Water Division 5; and The Colorado Water Conservation Board

Trout, Witwer Freeman, P.C. Robert V. Trout Douglas M. Sinor Denver, Colorado Attorneys for Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and Municipal Subdistrict, Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District

Porzak Browning Bushong LLP Glenn E. Porzak Steven J. Bushong, Boulder, Colorado, Attorneys for Applicant-Appellee

Trout Unlimited Andrew Peternell Boulder, Colorado Attorneys for Opposer-Appellee Trout Unlimited


CHIEF JUSTICE MULLARKEY, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, and JUSTICE BENDER are of the opinion that the judgments of District Court, Water Division 5 should be affirmed, whereas JUSTICE KOURLIS, JUSTICE RICE and JUSTICE COATS are of the opinion that they should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the judgments of District Court, Water Division 5 are affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 35(e).

JUSTICE HOBBS does not participate.


Summaries of

Concering the Application for Water Rights

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
May 19, 2003
69 P.3d 1028 (Colo. 2003)
Case details for

Concering the Application for Water Rights

Case Details

Full title:Concerning The Application For Water Rights of The Eagle River Water…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: May 19, 2003

Citations

69 P.3d 1028 (Colo. 2003)

Citing Cases

Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District

Before the water courts ultimately granted the respective conditional decrees, the General Assembly enacted…