From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Compagnie de Reassurance d'Ile de France v. New England Reinsurance Corp.

U.S.
Dec 4, 1995
516 U.S. 1009 (1995)

Summary

holding that Eichel "compels the conclusion that the collateral source rule prohibits admission of RRA disability benefits in a FELA case"

Summary of this case from CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Gardner

Opinion

No. 95-478.

December 4, 1995.


C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 57 F. 3d 56.


Summaries of

Compagnie de Reassurance d'Ile de France v. New England Reinsurance Corp.

U.S.
Dec 4, 1995
516 U.S. 1009 (1995)

holding that Eichel "compels the conclusion that the collateral source rule prohibits admission of RRA disability benefits in a FELA case"

Summary of this case from CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Gardner

finding no preemption where plaintiffs attempted to hold HMOs liable for their role as arrangers of their decedents' medical treatment

Summary of this case from Toledo v. Kaiser Permanente Medical Group
Case details for

Compagnie de Reassurance d'Ile de France v. New England Reinsurance Corp.

Case Details

Full title:COMPAGNIE DE REASSURANCE D'ILE DE FRANCE ET AL. v. NEW ENGLAND REINSURANCE…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 4, 1995

Citations

516 U.S. 1009 (1995)

Citing Cases

Person v. Physicians Health, Plan Inc.

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 63, 107 S.Ct. 1542, 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987); Franchise Bd.,…

Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development Associates

(Citation omitted.) State v. Szymkiewicz, 237 Conn. 613, 621, 678 A.2d 473 (1996); see State v. Spears, 234…