From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Torrence

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 4, 2012
41 A.3d 855 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

2012-04-4

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Steward STECKLEY, Jr., Petitioner.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 681 MAL 2011

Prior report: Pa.Super., 32 A.3d 835.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court's imposition of a mandatory minimum given a failure to notify the Defendant/Appellant of the applicability of said mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9718.2(d)?

(2) Whether notice of the applicability of Section 9718.2 from defense counsel can satisfy Subsection 9718.2(d)'s notice requirement without violating attorney/client privilege and defense counsel's duty to provide zealous representation?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Torrence

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 4, 2012
41 A.3d 855 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Torrence

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Frederick M. TORRENCE, aka Kevin…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Apr 4, 2012

Citations

41 A.3d 855 (Pa. 2012)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Steckley

On April 4, 2012, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted Steckley's petition for allowance of appeal, but…