From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Terry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 28, 1977
368 A.2d 279 (Pa. 1977)

Summary

In Terry, our Supreme Court held that 19 P.S. § 793 did not authorize the Philadelphia Municipal Court to order the defendant to pay for the Public Defender's representation after that court acquitted the defendant of drug-related charges.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Rivera

Opinion

Argued April 2, 1976.

Decided January 28, 1977.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Philadelphia, M.C. 75-09-494, Samuel M. Lehrer, J.

Defender Association of Phila., Benjamin Lerner, Defender, John W. Packel, Asst. Defender, Chief, Appeals Div., Philadelphia, for appellant.

John McNally, Jr., 1st Deputy City Sol., Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Arnold Terry was arrested at his residence in Philadelphia and charged with possession of a controlled substance (marijuana) with intent to deliver, contrary to the provisions of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, No. 64, § 13, as amended, 35 P. S. § 780-113 (Supp. 1976-77). Contemporaneously the police seized $775.00 in currency found in the residence. Shortly after the arrest, Terry was taken before a municipal court judge for preliminary arraignment. Bail was fixed at $2500.00 and the Defender Association was appointed to represent the accused.

Subsequently, after a hearing in the Municipal Court during which Terry had the assistance of the public defender, he was found not guilty of all charges. However, the trial court then entered an order directing that Terry pay to the city of Philadelphia the sum of $300.00 for the services rendered by the public defender. On petition, we assumed extraordinary jurisdiction to consider the power of the trial court to enter such an order.

The trial court cited no authority for its action. The district attorney maintains the authority is given in § 3 of the Act of January 19, 1968, P.L. (1967) 984, 19 P. S. § 793 (Supp. 1976-77), which provides for the reimbursement by a criminal defendant or a relative of the defendant to the county "for compensation and expense incurred and paid to court-appointed counsel." But the Act by its own terms does not apply where, as here, a local non-profit organization represents the defendant. See § 2 of the Act of 1968, 19 P. S. § 792 (Supp. 1976-77). Furthermore, authorization to enter such an order is given only upon petition of the county that paid the compensation. See § 3 of the Act of 1968, 19 P. S. § 793 (Supp. 1976-77).

Order vacated.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Terry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 28, 1977
368 A.2d 279 (Pa. 1977)

In Terry, our Supreme Court held that 19 P.S. § 793 did not authorize the Philadelphia Municipal Court to order the defendant to pay for the Public Defender's representation after that court acquitted the defendant of drug-related charges.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Rivera

In Commonwealth v. Terry, 470 Pa. 234, 368 A.2d 279 (1977), our Supreme Court vacated a lower court order requiring an accused who had been found innocent to reimburse the City of Philadelphia for services provided the accused by the public defender's office.

Summary of this case from Com. v. Pride

In Terry, the Commonwealth charged appellant with possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to deliver and the court appointed a public defender to represent him.

Summary of this case from Com. v. Pride
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Terry

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Arnold TERRY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 28, 1977

Citations

368 A.2d 279 (Pa. 1977)
368 A.2d 279

Citing Cases

Com. v. Pride

We believe that our Supreme Court has clearly determined that there is no statutory authority to support the…

In re Estate of Damario

We are satisfied that this broad grant of judicial authority vests in the orphans' court the power to order…