From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Stone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 16, 1970
264 A.2d 406 (Pa. 1970)

Opinion

April 16, 1970.

Appeals — Counsel for defendant — Representation in role of advocate — Failure to file brief in Superior Court — Inadequate petition for allowance of appeal.

In this case, in which it appeared that petitioner's counsel in the Superior Court had filed no brief and filed an inadequate petition for allowance of appeal, it was Held that there was not the representation in the role of an advocate which was required; accordingly, the petition for allocatur was granted, the order of the Superior Court vacated, and the case remanded so that the Superior Court might consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.

Before BELL, C. J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

Petition for leave to appeal, No. 3082-A, Miscellaneous Docket, from order of Superior Court, No. 282, April T., 1968, affirming order of Court of Oyer and Terminer of Allegheny County, June T., 1955, Nos. 104 and 110, in case of Commonwealth v. Kenneth Stone. Petition granted, order of Superior Court vacated, and case remanded.

Same case in Superior Court: 216 Pa. Super. 767.

Petition for post-conviction relief.

Order entered dismissing petition, opinion by LEWIS, J. Defendant appealed to Superior Court, which affirmed the order of the lower court dismissing the petition. Petition for allocatur filed with Supreme Court.

John J. Dean, Assistant Public Defender, and George H. Ross, Public Defender, for appellant.

Carol Mary Los, Assistant District Attorney, and Robert W. Duggan, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


Petitioner's counsel in the Superior Court filed no brief and has filed an inadequate petition for allowance of appeal with this Court. This is not the "representation in the role of an advocate" which we require. See Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 675, 78 S.Ct. 974, 2 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1958); Commonwealth v. Stein, 436 Pa. 330, 260 A.2d 467 (1969). Accordingly, the petition for allocatur is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Stone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 16, 1970
264 A.2d 406 (Pa. 1970)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Stone

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Stone, Petitioner

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 16, 1970

Citations

264 A.2d 406 (Pa. 1970)
264 A.2d 406

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Sullivan

See Commonwealth v. Cheeks, 429 Pa. 89, 96-97, 239 A.2d 793, 797 (1968). Therefore, where an appellant is…

Com. v. Swint

Counsel's ineffective assistance in pursuing a Rule 1100 violation requires that appellant be discharged. See…