From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Raboin

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
May 11, 2020
233 A.3d 672 (Pa. 2020)

Opinion

No. 441 WAL 2019

05-11-2020

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Thomas August RABOIN, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of May, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Where the Commonwealth is permitted a near blanket introduction of videotaped forensic examination of a child victim in a sexual assault case, during rebuttal, and thus not contemporaneously with any limited reference to said forensic examination by the defense, where numerous unfairly prejudicial statements are contained in the forensic examination, is such appropriate under the rule of completeness set for in Pa.R.E. 106 ?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Raboin

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
May 11, 2020
233 A.3d 672 (Pa. 2020)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Raboin

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. THOMAS AUGUST RABOIN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: May 11, 2020

Citations

233 A.3d 672 (Pa. 2020)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Raboin

Where the Commonwealth is permitted a near blanket introduction of [the] videotaped forensic examination of a…