From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Pasture

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 27, 2013
77 A.3d 618 (Pa. 2013)

Summary

granting review of Superior Court decision vacating the defendant's sentence a second time after original vacatur in Pasture I

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Rigg

Opinion

2013-09-27

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Tyde PASTURE, Respondent.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 258 EAL 2012.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 48 A.3d 489.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Following remand of this matter for reconsideration by the Superior Court in light of Commonwealth v. Perry, 612 Pa. 557, 32 A.3d 232 (2011), did the Superior Court, in purporting to distinguish Perry, disregard, for a second time, this Court's directives in Perry and Commonwealth v. Walls, 592 Pa. 557, 926 A.2d 957 (2007)?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Pasture

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 27, 2013
77 A.3d 618 (Pa. 2013)

granting review of Superior Court decision vacating the defendant's sentence a second time after original vacatur in Pasture I

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Rigg
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Pasture

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Tyde PASTURE, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

77 A.3d 618 (Pa. 2013)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Rigg

In those instances, the High Court was asked to determine whether this Court reviewed the issue under the…

Commonwealth v. Pasture

Following remand of this matter for reconsideration by the Superior Court in light of Commonwealth v. Perry,…