From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Moore

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jun 10, 2019
214 A.3d 232 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 556 EAL 2018

06-10-2019

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Ingram MOORE, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

a. Did the lower court abuse its discretion by turning the State Writ of Habeas Corpus into a PCRA petition, then time barring the petition?
b. Does the Superior Court panel's opinion in question conflict with another Superior Court panel on the same legal question of PCRA cognizability?

The Prothonotary is directed to forward this order and the underlying Petition for Allowance of Appeal to the pro bono coordinator for possible selection of counsel to represent Petitioner for purposes of the appeal.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Moore

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jun 10, 2019
214 A.3d 232 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. INGRAM MOORE, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 10, 2019

Citations

214 A.3d 232 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Moore

b. Does the Superior Court panel's opinion in question conflict with another Superior Court panel on the same…