Summary
granting review of the issue of whether the Superior Court erred in holding that a handgun that was only partially tucked into a waistband, with the handle visible, was "concealed" for purposes of the Uniform Firearms Act
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. MontgomeryOpinion
No. 481 EAL 2018
03-12-2019
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Darren MONTGOMERY, Petitioner
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Did not the Superior Court err, in a published opinion, in holding that a handgun that was only partially tucked into a waistband, with the handle being visible to all, was nonetheless "concealed" for the purposes of the Uniform Firearms Act?