From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Mineau

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Sep 24, 2010
933 N.E.2d 1033 (Mass. App. Ct. 2010)

Summary

holding that defense counsel could open the door on cross-examination of the complaining witness to evidence barred by a motion in limine

Summary of this case from State v. Lavoie

Opinion

NO. 08-P-931.

September 24, 2010.


Decisions Pursuant to Rule 1:28.

The judgments on counts four and seven are vacated, and the verdicts are set aside. Judgments shall enter for the defendant on those counts. The remaining judgments are affirmed. The order denying the motion for new trial is affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Mineau

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Sep 24, 2010
933 N.E.2d 1033 (Mass. App. Ct. 2010)

holding that defense counsel could open the door on cross-examination of the complaining witness to evidence barred by a motion in limine

Summary of this case from State v. Lavoie
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Mineau

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH v. ROBERT MINEAU (and eight companion cases)

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Sep 24, 2010

Citations

933 N.E.2d 1033 (Mass. App. Ct. 2010)
77 Mass. App. Ct. 1123

Citing Cases

State v. Lavoie

Hawai'i and other jurisdictions have held that HRE Rule 404(b) notice may be excused if (1) the opposing…

Mineau v. Saba

On September 24, 2010, the Appeals Court vacated the convictions for indecent assault and battery as…