From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. McIntyre

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 1, 2020
227 A.3d 310 (Pa. 2020)

Opinion

No. 25 EAP 2019

04-01-2020

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. Jerome MCINTYRE, Appellant

Bruce Philip Merenstein, Esq., Philadelphia, Brandy Sue Ringer, Esq., Pittsburgh, PA, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, for Appellant. Daniel Francis Creedon, Esq., Paul M. George, Esq., Lawrence Jonathan Goode, Esq., Katelyn Lori Mays, Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, for Appellee.


Bruce Philip Merenstein, Esq., Philadelphia, Brandy Sue Ringer, Esq., Pittsburgh, PA, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, for Appellant.

Daniel Francis Creedon, Esq., Paul M. George, Esq., Lawrence Jonathan Goode, Esq., Katelyn Lori Mays, Esq., Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, for Appellee.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of April 1, 2020, Appellant’s judgment of sentence is REVERSED and his "Unopposed Application for Expedited Consideration" is DISMISSED AS MOOT .

Opinion to follow.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. McIntyre

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 1, 2020
227 A.3d 310 (Pa. 2020)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. McIntyre

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. JEROME MCINTYRE, Appellant

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 1, 2020

Citations

227 A.3d 310 (Pa. 2020)