From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Malone

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 29, 1978
376 Mass. 931 (Mass. 1978)

Opinion

December 29, 1978.

Priscilla Labovitz ( Philip Weinberg with her) for the defendant.

Stephen M. Needle, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.


As in Commonwealth v. Vitello, ante 426 (1978), the defendant in this case excepted to the admission of polygraph evidence as part of the Commonwealth's case in chief. As in that case, therefore, we order a new trial. As an afterthought, the Commonwealth contends that the Vitello decision should be limited to prospective application, but we impose no such limitation. Also as an afterthought, the Commonwealth contends that the error was harmless, but we are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judgments of the Superior Court Department reversed. Verdicts set aside.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Malone

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 29, 1978
376 Mass. 931 (Mass. 1978)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Malone

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH vs. BRENDA MALONE

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Dec 29, 1978

Citations

376 Mass. 931 (Mass. 1978)
384 N.E.2d 624

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Walden

However, the rules of the Vitello case apply to this trial. See Commonwealth v. Malone, 376 Mass. 931 (1978).…

Commonwealth v. Soares

The rule adopted today applies to the defendants in these cases and to the defendants in all cases now…