From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Maguire

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 7, 2018
190 A.3d 1130 (Pa. 2018)

Opinion

No. 105 MAL 2018

08-07-2018

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Jeffery Charles MAGUIRE, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:

1. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in reversing the trial court's suppression of the evidence obtained during the commercial vehicle stop based upon failure to abide by the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines?
2. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in determining that the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines do not apply to commercial vehicle check-points?
3. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in failing to affirm the decision of the trial court on alternate grounds?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Maguire

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Aug 7, 2018
190 A.3d 1130 (Pa. 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Maguire

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. JEFFERY CHARLES MAGUIRE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 7, 2018

Citations

190 A.3d 1130 (Pa. 2018)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Maguire

3. Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/abuse of discretion in failing to affirm the decision…