From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Kling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 29, 1940
13 A.2d 104 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)

Summary

In Commonwealth v. Kling, 140 Pa. Super. 68, 13 A.2d 104, 105, it was held that free games or the lure to play for them on a pinball machine was not "a `thing' of value."

Summary of this case from State v. One "JACK and JILL" Pinball

Opinion

April 10, 1940.

April 29, 1940.

Appeal, No. 3, March T., 1941, from order of Q.S. Dauphin Co., Sept. Sessions, 1939, No. 387, in case of Commonwealth v. Paul Kling.

Before KELLER, P.J., CUNNINGHAM, BALDRIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER, RHODES and HIRT, JJ. Order affirmed.

Indictment charging defendant with establishing a gaming place. Before Fox J., without a jury.

Defendant adjudged guilty. Motion by defendant in arrest of judgment sustained and defendant discharged. Commonwealth appealed.

Error assigned was the action of the court below in sustaining the motion in arrest of judgment.

Lewis S. Kunkel, Assistant District Attorney, with him Carl B. Shelley, District Attorney, for appellant.

Thomas D. Caldwell, with him Robert T. Fox, Carl B. Stoner, Maurice Yoffee and Caldwell, Fox Stoner, for appellee.


Argued April 10, 1940.


MEMORANDUM DECISION.


Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Kling

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 29, 1940
13 A.2d 104 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)

In Commonwealth v. Kling, 140 Pa. Super. 68, 13 A.2d 104, 105, it was held that free games or the lure to play for them on a pinball machine was not "a `thing' of value."

Summary of this case from State v. One "JACK and JILL" Pinball
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Kling

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth, Appellant, v. Kling

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 29, 1940

Citations

13 A.2d 104 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1940)
13 A.2d 104

Citing Cases

State v. Wiley

The footnote cites State ex rel. Manchester v. Marvin, supra. See, also, 24 Am. Jur. 422, and annotations in…

The People v. One Mechanical Device

The court in that case relied upon cases from other jurisdictions interpreting a variety of differing…