From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Glover

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Mar 9, 2005
63 Mass. App. Ct. 1105 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005)

Summary

holding that a Rule 29 motion filed prior to DeJesús was “defective in that it was not accompanied by the required affidavit as specified by [R]ule 29(b), did [not] adequately state the grounds for relief in order to be considered properly filed”

Summary of this case from Holmes v. Spencer

Opinion

No. 04-P-500.

March 9, 2005.


Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28.

Order allowing motion to revise and revoke sentence reversed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Glover

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Mar 9, 2005
63 Mass. App. Ct. 1105 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005)

holding that a Rule 29 motion filed prior to DeJesús was “defective in that it was not accompanied by the required affidavit as specified by [R]ule 29(b), did [not] adequately state the grounds for relief in order to be considered properly filed”

Summary of this case from Holmes v. Spencer
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Glover

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH vs. ROY GLOVER

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 9, 2005

Citations

63 Mass. App. Ct. 1105 (Mass. App. Ct. 2005)

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Spencer

ecide whether to apply DeJesús retroactively, see Artuz, 531 U.S. at 8, 121 S.Ct. 361, and Massachusetts law…