Opinion
Submitted September 20, 1976.
Decided April 28, 1977.
Appeal No. 132 March Term, 1976, from the Order of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, sitting at Pittsburgh, 238 Pa. Super. 738, 357 A.2d 208, No. 205 April Term, 1975 Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, Pennsylvania, Criminal Division, at Nos. 847, 902 and 951 of 1972; Lindley R. McClelland, Judge.
Harold J. Bender, Public Defender, Erie, for appellant.
Robert H. Chase, Dist. Atty., Frank J. Scutella, Asst. Dist. Atty., Erie, for appellee.
Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.
OPINION
Appellant appeals the dismissal of his Post-Conviction Hearing Act Petition. He challenges the validity of his plea of guilty to charges of burglary and larceny on the ground that his on-the-record guilty plea colloquy was inadequate under Pa.R.Crim.P. 319. Although this claim was cognizable on direct appeal, e. g., Commonwealth v. Hines, 461 Pa. 271, 336 A.2d 280 (1975), appellant took no appeal from the judgment of sentence. In this PCHA proceeding, appellant has not alleged facts which would justify his failure to raise this claim on appeal. Accordingly, the claim has been waived, 19 P. S. § 11804(b); see, e. g., Commonwealth v. Hines, supra, and the counseled petition was properly dismissed.
Act of January 25, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1580, §§ 1 et seq., 19 P. S. § 1180-1 et seq. (Supp. 1976).
Appellant's PCHA petition asserted that his trial counsel was ineffective. Ineffectiveness of counsel is a circumstance which excuses the failure to raise an issue in a prior proceeding and precludes a finding of waiver under 19 P. S. § 1180-4(b) (Supp. 1976). Commonwealth v. Roundtree, 469 Pa. 241, 247 n. 4, 364 A.2d 1359, 1362 n. 4 (1976); Commonwealth v. Waddy, 463 Pa. 426, 429, 345 A.2d 179, 180 (1975) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Wideman, 453 Pa. 119, 123, 306 A.2d 894, 896 (1973). See generally Commonwealth v. Mabie, 467 Pa. 464, 359 A.2d 369 (1976). At the PCHA hearing, however, appellant withdrew his allegation that his trial counsel had been ineffective.
Order affirmed.