From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Crutchfield

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Sep 15, 1978
380 N.E.2d 144 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978)

Opinion

September 15, 1978.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Daniel E. Callahan, for the defendant.

Thomas J. Carey, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Patricia A. Norton for the Commonwealth.


The defendant was not harmed by the exclusion of the question put to the witness Phillips (the defendant's sister) on direct examination as to the prior consistent statement which had supposedly been made to her by the witness Elmore; the jury heard Elmore's statement twice (in words virtually identical to those employed by the defendant's counsel in his offer of proof) during the course of the prosecutor's cross examination of Phillips. See Commonwealth v. Martin, ante 858 (1978). Indeed, the prosecutor extended an invitation to Phillips, which she accepted, to testify that she believed Elmore.

Judgments affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Crutchfield

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Sep 15, 1978
380 N.E.2d 144 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Crutchfield

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH vs. ANTHONY CRUTCHFIELD

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Sep 15, 1978

Citations

380 N.E.2d 144 (Mass. App. Ct. 1978)
6 Mass. App. Ct. 923

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Patch

Commonwealth v. Hersey, 324 Mass. 196, 202-203 (1949), overruled on other grounds, Commonwealth v. Niziolek,…