From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Becker (In re Pugh)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 15, 2019
No. 25 MM 2019 (Pa. May. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 25 MM 2019

05-15-2019

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THOMAS EARL BECKER PETITION OF: R. RUSSELL PUGH


ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2019, in consideration of the Petition to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County for that court to determine whether Thomas Becker's current counsel should be granted leave to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an attorney may not unilaterally withdraw his or her appearance with respect to a criminal defendant; rather, a court must determine whether leave to withdraw is warranted); see also Pa.R.Crim.P. 904 (providing that appointed counsel's representation in a PCRA matter continues through the allocatur review stage).

If current counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any issues relative to Thomas Becker being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro se. The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County is DIRECTED to enter its order regarding this remand within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Becker (In re Pugh)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 15, 2019
No. 25 MM 2019 (Pa. May. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Becker (In re Pugh)

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THOMAS EARL BECKER PETITION OF: R. RUSSELL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: May 15, 2019

Citations

No. 25 MM 2019 (Pa. May. 15, 2019)

Citing Cases

Lucky Five Min. Co. v. Central Idaho Placer Gold M. Co.

Evidence as to ancient boundaries and declarations of deceased persons with reference thereto are admissible…

Duncan v. Eagle Mining

As said in Bryan v. McCaig, supra: "The act of Congress of March 3, 1881, authorizing the jury to find that…