From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 5, 2011
32 A.3d 1259 (Pa. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-5

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. James Monroe BALDWIN, Petitioner.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 636 WAL 2010.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 8 A.3d 901.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the test employed in United States v. Peterson, 233 F.3d 101 (1st Cir.2000), adopted by the Superior Court in this case, to be utilized when a criminal defendant seeks to testify after the close of evidence, is an unconstitutional burden on a citizen's fundamental right to testify in his own defense?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 5, 2011
32 A.3d 1259 (Pa. 2011)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. James Monroe BALDWIN…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Dec 5, 2011

Citations

32 A.3d 1259 (Pa. 2011)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Whether the test employed in United States v. Peterson, 233 F.3d 101 (1st Cir.2000), adopted by the Superior…