From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth Tr. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Driscoll

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 9, 1943
137 F.2d 653 (3d Cir. 1943)

Summary

In Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Driscoll, 137 F.2d 653, the Circuit Court affirmed 50 Fed. Supp. 949, on the reasoning of the District Court and without further opinion.

Summary of this case from Estate of Rickenberg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Opinion

No. 8322.

Argued July 7, 1943.

Decided July 9, 1943. Rehearing Denied September 20, 1943.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for Western District of Pennsylvania; Frederic P. Schoonmaker, Judge.

William Wallace Booth, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (W.A. Seifert and Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Helen Goodner, of Washington, D.C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Charles F. Uhl, U.S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, JONES, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons sufficiently and satisfactorily given in the opinion of Judge Schoonmaker, 50 F. Supp. 949.


Summaries of

Commonwealth Tr. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Driscoll

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 9, 1943
137 F.2d 653 (3d Cir. 1943)

In Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. Driscoll, 137 F.2d 653, the Circuit Court affirmed 50 Fed. Supp. 949, on the reasoning of the District Court and without further opinion.

Summary of this case from Estate of Rickenberg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Case details for

Commonwealth Tr. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Driscoll

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH TRUST CO. OF PITTSBURGH and J. Knowles Woodwell, Executors of…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 1943

Citations

137 F.2d 653 (3d Cir. 1943)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Campbell

These make it clear that only the net amount actually paid to the state can be claimed as a credit against…

United States Trust Co. of New York v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Jordahl)

Decedent was thereby prohibited from depleting the trust corpus. Compare: Commonwealth Trust Co. of…