From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioner v. Fry

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 18, 1960
283 F.2d 869 (6th Cir. 1960)

Opinion

Nos. 14095, 14096.

October 18, 1960.

John J. Pajak, Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and I. Henry Kutz, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.

Charles H. Davis, Memphis, Tenn., Montedonico, Boone, Gilliland, Heiskell Loch, Memphis, Tenn., on brief, for respondents.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised:

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decision of the Tax Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Tietjens. 31 T.C. 522.


Summaries of

Commissioner v. Fry

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 18, 1960
283 F.2d 869 (6th Cir. 1960)
Case details for

Commissioner v. Fry

Case Details

Full title:COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. William N. FRY, Jr., and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 1960

Citations

283 F.2d 869 (6th Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

Kuhn v. United States

Gist v. United States, 296 F.Supp. 526 (S.D.Cal.1969), aff'd 423 F.2d 1118 (9th Cir. 1970); Estate of Daisy…