From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commander v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Feb 6, 2003
No. 14-02-01298-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 6, 2003)

Opinion

No. 14-02-01298-CR

February 6, 2003. Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 890,927

Panel consists of Justices ANDERSON, SEYMORE, and GUZMAN.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. On October 28, 2002, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 25 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Our review of the record indicates that we have no jurisdiction over this appeal. To invoke an appellate court's jurisdiction over an appeal, an appellant must give timely and proper notice of appeal. White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Appellant filed a timely general notice of appeal that did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(b)(3). Rule 25.2(b)(3) provides that when an appeal is from a judgment rendered on a defendant's plea of guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment assessed does not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal must: (1) specify that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect; (2) specify that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial; or (3) state that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Id. Because appellant's notice of appeal did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3), we are without jurisdiction to consider any of appellant's issues, including the voluntariness of the plea. See Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.2d 77, 83 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001) (holding that appellant who files general notice of appeal may not appeal voluntariness of negotiated plea). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The notice of appeal in this case was filed prior to the amendments to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure effective January 1, 2003.


Summaries of

Commander v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Feb 6, 2003
No. 14-02-01298-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 6, 2003)
Case details for

Commander v. State

Case Details

Full title:HEATH WADE COMMANDER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Feb 6, 2003

Citations

No. 14-02-01298-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 6, 2003)