Comesana v. State

Full title: DAMIAN COMESANA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 11, 2002

831 So. 2d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D01-1982.

Opinion filed December 11, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lawrence A. Schwartz, Judge. L.T. No. 98-21728.

Peter Raben, Coconut Grove, for appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney Genera and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GREEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla. 1990) (under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (evidentiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).