Summary
In Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 567 U.S. 933, 933, 133 S.Ct. 24, 183 L.Ed.2d 673 (2012) (mem.), the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the following question: "[w]hether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis."
Summary of this case from Desai v. Geico Cas. Co.Opinion
No. 11–864.
2012-06-25
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al., petitioners, v. Caroline BEHREND, et al.
Case below, 655 F.3d 182.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to the following question: “Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis.”