From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Hobson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 2, 1978
393 A.2d 29 (Pa. 1978)

Summary

holding that, because record was devoid of any indication that defendant ever filed motion for change of venue, court remanded matter to trial court to determine whether motion was filed and disposed of by trial court, because court could not address defendant's argument that trial court had erred in failing to grant motion

Summary of this case from City of Phila. v. Dugs, Inc.

Opinion

Argued September 22, 1978.

Decided November 2, 1978.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Criminal, Erie County, No. 1865, 1865-1 of 1976.

William J. Hain, Erie, for appellant.

Shad Connelly, Asst. Dist. Atty., Erie, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, MANDERINO and LARSEN, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Appellant, Edward Earl Hobson, was tried by a judge sitting with a jury in connection with the homicide of Steve Allen Burton. Appellant was found guilty of murder of the third degree. Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to eight to sixteen years imprisonment. This direct appeal followed.

Appellant first argues that the court below erred in failing to grant his motion for a change of venue. The record in the instant case is devoid of any indication that such a motion was ever filed and decided by the court below.

The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County for a prompt determination of whether a motion for a change of venue was filed and disposed of by that court. See Pa.R.A.P. 1926. If such a motion was filed, then the record should be supplemented to include: (1) a true and correct verified copy of the motion for change of venue, (2) the transcript of any testimony and/or legal arguments presented in consideration of the motion, and (3) the transcript of any notes of the voir dire examination. If no motion for change of venue was filed, the court of common pleas should determine whether that issue has been waived. This remand shall not be construed to permit a relitigation of the motion for change of venue.

This court shall retain jurisdiction over the instant case. After the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County makes the above determinations and makes any necessary additions to the record, this case shall forthwith be returned to this court. See Pa.R.A.P. 1926.


Summaries of

Com. v. Hobson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 2, 1978
393 A.2d 29 (Pa. 1978)

holding that, because record was devoid of any indication that defendant ever filed motion for change of venue, court remanded matter to trial court to determine whether motion was filed and disposed of by trial court, because court could not address defendant's argument that trial court had erred in failing to grant motion

Summary of this case from City of Phila. v. Dugs, Inc.
Case details for

Com. v. Hobson

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Edward Earl HOBSON, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 2, 1978

Citations

393 A.2d 29 (Pa. 1978)
393 A.2d 29

Citing Cases

Supko v. Monoskey

As a result, because there is a question "as to whether the record truly discloses what occurred in the lower…

Hatalowich v. Bednarski

If any difference arises as to whether the record truly discloses what occurred in the lower court, the…