From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 1977
474 Pa. 386 (Pa. 1977)

Opinion

Argued March 29, 1976.

Decided October 7, 1977.

Appeal from the Philadelphia Municipal Court, Nos. 2144-2146, October Sessions, 1975, Benjamin W. Schwartz, J.

Defender Association of Phila., John W. Packel, Asst. Public Defender, Chief, Appeals Div., for appellants.

F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Dist. Atty., Steven H. Goldblatt, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Div., Gaile R. McLaughlin, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


The appellants in this case were summarily adjudicated guilty of criminal contempt in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia and each was sentenced to a jail term of six months. Jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, July 31, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. II, § 202(5), 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.202(5) (Supp. 1977-78). However, § 211.202(5) provides for a direct appeal to this Court in cases of orders of direct criminal contempt in the Courts of Common Pleas and other contempt proceedings in the Courts of Common Pleas relating to orders which are appealable directly to the Supreme Court. See Commonwealth v. Africa, 466 Pa. 603, n. 1 at 610, 353 A.2d 855, n. 1 at 858 (1976). However, these convictions arose in Municipal Court and not the Court of Common Pleas. We, therefore, transfer the matter to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia with instructions that it proceed to hear and decide the appeal in accordance with the statutes of this Commonwealth and the rules of this Court. Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, supra, art. V, § 503(b), 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.503 (b). See also Act of October 17, 1969, P.L. 259, § 19, 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 711. 19 (Supp. 1977-78); Act of 1968, December 2, P.L. 1137, No. 355, § 3, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 3003 (Supp. 1977-78); Pa. Rules of Criminal Procedure 67.

In Commonwealth v. Africa, 466 Pa. 603, 353 A.2d 855 (1976), which also involved appeals from criminal contempt adjudications in Municipal Court, this Court heard the appeals on the authority of the Act of 1970, July 31, P.L. 673, art. V, § 503(a), 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.503(a) (Supp. 1977-78); in the absence of jurisdictional objection on the part of appellee we accepted jurisdiction. In Africa the "Court accepted jurisdiction, in part, because the Commonwealth urged that both the jurisdictional and substantive issues deserved our attention." Id. at 618, n. 4, 353 A.2d at 862 n. 4. In the instant appeal, to the contrary, the Commonwealth has noted its strenuous objection to the perfection of jurisdiction in this Court and urged that the orderly process for appellate review of Municipal Court adjudications be followed.

JONES, former C. J., did not participate in the decision of this case.

MANDERINO, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Com. v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 1977
474 Pa. 386 (Pa. 1977)
Case details for

Com. v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Conrad HAMPTON et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 1977

Citations

474 Pa. 386 (Pa. 1977)
378 A.2d 847

Citing Cases

Com. v. Stoltzfus

Instead, we order transfer of the appeal to Superior Court. Pa.R.A.P. 751; see Commonwealth v. Hampton, 474…

Com. v. Jones

Section (g) of the above rule clearly pronounces that this rule shall provide the exclusive means of…