From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Colleran

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 23, 1983
323 Pa. Super. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983)

Summary

In Colleran, this Court stated that the defendant should have filed a petition for review pursuant to Rule 1762(b) instead of a notice of appeal.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Parsons

Opinion

Submitted: July 28, 1983.

Filed: December 23, 1983.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, Luzerne County, No. 440-A of 1981, Podcasy, J.

Joseph F. Sklarosky, Assistant Public Defender, Wilkes-Barre, for appellant.

Robert J. Gillespie, District Attorney, Wilkes-Barre, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before ROWLEY, BECK and MONTEMURO, JJ.


The appellant was convicted of criminal conspiracy following a jury trial on June 3, 1981. He posted bail in the amount of five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars pursuant to the trial court's order. Post-verdict motions were also filed.

On January 1, 1982, prior to the resolution of appellant's post-verdict motions and prior to sentencing, the appellant was arrested and charged in connection with a burglary. On February 4, 1982, the Commonwealth filed a petition to revoke bail on the criminal conspiracy conviction. On February 9, 1982, after a full hearing, the trial court revoked appellant's bail pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 4010A. (2)(ii). The trial judge stated his reasons for revoking bail on the record as required by the rule. On February 25, 1982, the appellant filed an appeal from the order revoking bail.

An appeal from an order revoking bail is an interlocutory order, which is non-appealable, Pa. Rules of Appellate Procedure 311, 312 and 341. The proper method to challenge an order of a trial court refusing or revoking bail is by means of a petition for review pursuant to Chapter 15 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Pa.R.A.P. 1762. Inasmuch as the improper procedure was utilized herein, this appeal is quashed.

Appeal quashed.


Summaries of

Com. v. Colleran

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 23, 1983
323 Pa. Super. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983)

In Colleran, this Court stated that the defendant should have filed a petition for review pursuant to Rule 1762(b) instead of a notice of appeal.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Parsons
Case details for

Com. v. Colleran

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Francis T. COLLERAN, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 23, 1983

Citations

323 Pa. Super. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983)
469 A.2d 1130

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Rookstool

This Court has stated that an order revoking bail is interlocutory and cannot be immediately appealed without…

Commonwealth v. Rookstool

This Court has stated that an order revoking bail is interlocutory and cannot be immediately appealed without…