From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. ex rel. Schlesinger v. Schlesinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 11, 1974
231 Pa. Super. 284 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1974)

Opinion

September 9, 1974.

December 11, 1974.

Parent and Child — Support — Support for 22-year-old daughter's college expenses — Trust fund under which daughter is the beneficiary.

1. An order of support will be entered only if there is a need for support.

2. In this case, a father was ordered to pay support to be used toward his 22-year-old daughter's college education. The daughter was the beneficiary of a $10,000 trust fund. It was Held that the case would be remanded for further hearing concerning the trust fund.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

Appeal, No. 483, Oct. T., 1974, from order of Court of Common Pleas, Family Division, of Philadelphia. No. D.R. 252648, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Helen Schlesinger v. Stanley Schlesinger. Case remanded.

Nonsupport. Before CIPRIANI, J.

Order entered in amount of $15.00 per week, for support of adult child attending college. Defendant, father, appealed.

Howard Wallner, for appellant.

Roger J. Harrington, for appellee.


Argued September 9, 1974.


This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia directing the appellant-father, Stanley Schlesinger, to pay Fifteen Dollars ($15.00) weekly toward the support of his twenty-two (22) year old daughter's college expenses. The order was made after a petition for vacating a support order was brought by the appellant-father on the ground that his daughter was now an adult, 22 years of age, and his obligation to support no longer existed. The original order was brought under The Pennsylvania Civil Procedural Support Law, 1953, July 13, P.L. 431, § 1, 62 P. S. § 2043.31.

Support, of course, implies need and dependency and there is in this case a Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollar Trust Fund of which the daughter is the beneficiary. In the lower court's opinion it was stated: "The Court is aware that the Trust Fund, whether belonging to the mother for administration purposes or now an outright possession of the minor, is an asset that can reasonably be utilized to defray college expense."

This Trust Fund may remove this adult daughter from need and dependency. An adult son who had the benefit of a Four Thousand ($4,000.00) Dollar Trust Fund had his support vacated. We should know more about this trust fund, how it was created, how it is administered and its benefits to the daughter.

This case is remanded to the court below for further hearing concerning the Ten Thousand ($10,000.00) Dollar Trust Fund.


Summaries of

Com. ex rel. Schlesinger v. Schlesinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 11, 1974
231 Pa. Super. 284 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1974)
Case details for

Com. ex rel. Schlesinger v. Schlesinger

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth ex rel. Schlesinger v. Schlesinger, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 11, 1974

Citations

231 Pa. Super. 284 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1974)
331 A.2d 694

Citing Cases

Sutliff v. Sutliff

We have always held that the independent resources of a college-age child, whether held in trust or…

Sutliff v. Sutliff

Out of cases following Doelp, Superior Court has evolved a rule that a court calculating child support may…