From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. ex Rel. Firmstone v. Myers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 11, 1957
184 Pa. Super. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1957)

Opinion

March 22, 1957.

June 11, 1957.

Criminal law — Practice — Writ of error coram nobis — Extrinsic facts — Fourth offender — Delinquent children between sixteen and eighteen years of age — Jurisdiction of court of quarter sessions — Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 1108(b) — Act of June 15, 1939, P.L. 394, amending Act of June 2, 1933, P.L. 1433.

1. In a proceeding upon an application for a writ of error coram nobis, in which it appeared that petitioner, who was serving a life sentence imposed on him, as a fourth offender, under the Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 1108(b), complained that when he had pleaded guilty to certain charges of burglary he had been under the impression that he was eighteen years of age, that he had since learned that he was then only seventeen years of age, and that, since he was of juvenile court age when these crimes were committed, the three convictions could not be cumulated with subsequent convictions of felonies to make him a fourth offender within the purview of the Act of 1939, it was Held that petitioner's contention was without merit, especially where it appeared that convictions on charges exclusive of the burglaries to which he had pleaded guilty were sufficient upon which to base a life sentence under the Act of 1939.

2. Under the Act of June 2, 1933, P.L. 1433, § 14, as amended by the Act of June 15, 1939, P.L. 394, if a delinquent child is between sixteen and eighteen years of age, the court of quarter sessions "may, at its discretion", but is not obliged to "transfer such cases to the juvenile court".

3. The writ of error coram nobis is not available where the facts alleged by petitioner, exclusive of the record, even if known at the time of judgment, would not have changed the result complained of.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, GUNTHER, WRIGHT, WOODSIDE, ERVIN, and WATKINS, JJ.

Appeal, No. 140, Oct. T., 1957, from order of Court of Quarter Sessions of Lycoming County, Sept. Sessions, 1955, No. 85, in case of Commonwealth ex rel. Nathaniel Firmstone v. David N. Myers, Warden. Order affirmed.

Proceeding upon application for writ of coram nobis.

Order entered refusing writ; opinion by GREEVY, J. Relator appealed.

Nathaniel Firmstone, appellant, in propria persona.

George M. Hess, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.


Submitted March 22, 1957.


The relator has appealed from the denial of his application for a writ of error coram nobis. Judge GREEVY, in the opinion accompanying the order of the lower court in this case, stated that this is the third time the petitioner has made application for a writ of coram nobis, and that four applications for writs of habeas corpus which had been filed by him had also been denied. Relator is now serving a life sentence imposed on him on May 21, 1952, as a fourth offender, under the Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 1108(b), 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5108.

Relator now complains that when he pleaded guilty to the charges of burglary in 1942 he was under the impression that he was 18 years of age; and that he has since learned that he then was only 17 years old. It is his present contention that since he was of juvenile court age when the 1942 crimes were committed these three convictions cannot be cumulated with subsequent convictions of felonies to make him a fourth offender within the purview of the Act.

By § 14 of the Act of June 2, 1933, P.L. 1433, the juvenile court was given exclusive jurisdiction in a case affecting a delinquent child under 16 years of age. But by the amendment of the section by the Act of June 15, 1939, P.L. 394, 11 P. S. § 256 if the child is between 16 and 18 years of age the court "may, at its discretion" but is not obliged to "transfer such cases to the juvenile court." Accordingly the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lycoming County had jurisdiction of the three offenses of which relator was convicted in 1942, even if his present averment as to his then age be accepted as true. Cf. Trignani's Case, 150 Pa. Super. 491, 28 A.2d 702. The writ of error coram nobis therefore is not available to him. The facts alleged, extrinsic of the record if known, would not have changed the result. Commonwealth v. Harris, 351 Pa. 325, 327, 41 A.2d 688; Commonwealth v. Ondrejcak, 181 Pa. Super. 102, 124 A.2d 406.

The petition well might have been refused because it is repetitious of prior applications; but in any view there is not the slightest merit in relator's present application. He was convicted of attempted burglary in 1949; and of entering a building with intent to steal, in 1951; and of robbery; and also of burglary in the same year. Cf. Com. ex rel. Firmstone v. Burke, 175 Pa. Super. 128, and especially note pp. 132, 133, 103 A.2d 476. Convictions on all these charges exclusive of the 1942 felonies to which he pleaded guilty, were sufficient upon which to base a life sentence under the Pennsylvania Habitual Criminal Act, supra.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Com. ex Rel. Firmstone v. Myers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 11, 1957
184 Pa. Super. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1957)
Case details for

Com. ex Rel. Firmstone v. Myers

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth ex rel. Firmstone, Appellant, v. Myers

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 11, 1957

Citations

184 Pa. Super. 1 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1957)
132 A.2d 707

Citing Cases

Gerberding v. State

It was held that under the statute and Kansas decisions, two such prior convictions were enough to sustain…

Commonwealth v. Pyle

Now, under the new statute, the determination of whether the interests of state and society require…