From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Employment Security v. Great Lakes Television Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 9, 1968
244 A.2d 795 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1968)

Opinion

June 13, 1968.

August 9, 1968.

Unemployment Compensation — Employe or independent contractor — Talent artists — Television broadcasting company — Unemployment Compensation Law.

In this case, in which it appeared that the Bureau of Employment Security made an assessment against defendant, engaged in the business of television broadcasting, for failure to include in its periodic reports "wages" paid to individuals as "talent fees"; that there was no formal contract signed between the defendant and the employe in question (and other persons whose relation to defendant was similar), but there was an agreement for an amount of pay, the time involved, and the type of job to be performed; that the payments to the claimants were made without deductions of any kind and were made by checks drawn on the general account of defendant rather than on the payroll account; that the union contract excluded talent artists from the definition of employes; that the work performed by claimant was at defendant's studio, at a time set by defendant and its clients; that the equipment of the station was used, and the props for claimant's program were furnished by defendant station; that direction to the talent artist was given by defendant, and if there was a script for the program it was furnished by defendant television company or the sponsor; and that the court below, finding that control of the services of the talent artists existed in the television company as an ultimate fact, and that neither the methods of payment for the services nor the fact that no deductions of any sort were made was determinative of the question whether the talent artists were employes or independent contractors, concluded that the remunerations received by the talent artists were "wages" within the meaning of the Unemployment Compensation Law and sustained the assessment; it was Held that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, and SPAULDING, JJ. (HANNUM, J., absent).

Appeal, No. 16, March T., 1968, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, No. 300 Commonwealth Docket 1965, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Employment Security, v. Great Lakes Television Company. Order affirmed.

Same case in court below: 39 Pa. D. C. 2d 399.

Appeal by employer from decision of Bureau of Employment Security denying petition for reassessment.

Order entered denying appeal, opinion by LIPSITT, J. Employer appealed.

James R. Jenks and John W. English, with them English, Bowler and Jenks, for appellant.

Morley W. Baker, Assistant Attorney General, with him William C. Sennett, Attorney General, for Commonwealth, appellee.


Argued June 13, 1968.


The Order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of LIPSITT, J.


Summaries of

Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Employment Security v. Great Lakes Television Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 9, 1968
244 A.2d 795 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1968)
Case details for

Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Employment Security v. Great Lakes Television Co.

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Employment…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 9, 1968

Citations

244 A.2d 795 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1968)
244 A.2d 795

Citing Cases

Pavalonis v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of Review

Both the statement and the claimant's own testimony showed that the claimant paid for all of his expenses…

C. A. Wright Plumbing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

It is clear that the nature of the job is immaterial provided that the employer supervises and directs the…