From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Columbus v. Kim

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 18, 2007
113 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-0391.

April 18, 2007.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-1334, 2006-Ohio-6985.


Motion and Procedural Rulings

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals' Memorandum Decision filed February 22, 2007:

"Whether an ordinance that prohibits a person from keeping or harboring an animal which `howls, barks, or emits audible sounds that are unreasonably loud or disturbing which are of such character, intensity, and duration as to disturb the peace and quiet of the neighborhood or to be detrimental to the life and health of any individual' is unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied."

PFEIFER and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is State v. Ferraiolo (2000), 140 Ohio App.3d 585, 748 N.E.2d 584.


Summaries of

Columbus v. Kim

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 18, 2007
113 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2007)
Case details for

Columbus v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:Columbus v. Kim

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 18, 2007

Citations

113 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2007)
2007 Ohio 1722

Citing Cases

City of Columbus v. Kim

We determined that a conflict exists on the following issue: "Whether an ordinance that prohibits a person…