From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Columbia Savings Loan Assoc. v. Bogusz

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 11, 1985
198 N.J. Super. 174 (App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

Submitted December 18, 1984 —

Decided January 11, 1985.

Before Judges PRESSLER, BRODY and HAVEY.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Camden County, whose opinion is reported at 191 N.J. Super. 327, 466 A.2d 968 (1983).

Joseph W. Hopkins, attorneys for appellant ( Joseph W. Hopkins, on the brief).

Supnick, Mitnick, Vogelson, Josselson and DePersia, attorneys for respondent ( Richard B. Supnick, on the brief).


The summary judgment appealed from enforcing the due-on-sale clause in the mortgage which is the subject of this foreclosure action is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Deighan in his opinion reported at 191 N.J. Super. 327 (Ch.Div. 1983).


Summaries of

Columbia Savings Loan Assoc. v. Bogusz

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jan 11, 1985
198 N.J. Super. 174 (App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Columbia Savings Loan Assoc. v. Bogusz

Case Details

Full title:COLUMBIA SAVINGS LOAN ASSOC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JUDITH BOGUSZ…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jan 11, 1985

Citations

198 N.J. Super. 174 (App. Div. 1985)
486 A.2d 911

Citing Cases

Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.

Questions of waiver, therefore, are usually questions of intent, which are factual determinations that should…

Scibek v. Longette

Stated simply, "[e]stoppel, as distinguished from waiver, involves conduct which precludes a person from…