From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colosimo v. Rosenstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 15, 1962
15 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

January 15, 1962


In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, alleged to have been sustained by reason of a motor vehicle, owned by defendant Economy Register Co. and operated by defendant Rosenstock, striking the rear of plaintiff's automobile when it stopped in obedience to a direction of a police officer controlling traffic, defendants appeal from an order of the City Court of New Rochelle, dated May 16, 1961, granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and directing an assessment of damages. Order reversed, without costs; and motion for summary judgment denied. In our opinion, the record presents triable issues of fact which may not be resolved upon a motion for summary judgment. ( Seman v. Harran, 15 A.D.2d 506; Mapp v. Kipperman, 12 A.D.2d 958; Block v. Acerra, 12 A.D.2d 525; Mandell v. Field, 11 A.D.2d 1074.) Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Colosimo v. Rosenstock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 15, 1962
15 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Colosimo v. Rosenstock

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. COLOSIMO, Respondent, v. MILDRED ROSENSTOCK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1962

Citations

15 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Andre v. Pomeroy

The rule of course is especially applicable to automobile collision cases. Indeed, appellate courts,…