From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colonies Partners, L.P. v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 5:18-cv-00420-JGB (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5:18-cv-00420-JGB (SHK)

03-27-2020

COLONIES PARTNERS, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions ("Motion"), Defendants' Opposition to the Motion ("Opposition" or "Opp'n"), Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of the Motion ("Reply"), the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("R&R"). Electronic Case Filing Number ("ECF No.") 249, Motion; ECF No. 263, Opp'n; ECF No. 266, Reply; ECF No. 305, R&R. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. / / / / / / / / /

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1) The R&R [ECF No. 305] is ADOPTED;

2) Plaintiffs' Motion [ECF No. 249] is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs seek an adverse jury instruction at trial—that the jury may presume that the deleted ESI information from the mike@joinmikeramos.com e-mail account and text messages deleted after March 2018, was unfavorable to Plaintiffs—but DENIED insofar as Plaintiffs seek terminating sanctions;

3) Plaintiffs are AWARDED reasonable fees associated with bringing this Motion; and

4) Plaintiffs must submit their declaration and records in support of their fee award for the Court's consideration within fourteen days of the date of this Order, Defendants shall file their Response within fourteen days of the filing of Plaintiffs' submission, and Plaintiffs may file a Reply within seven days of Defendants' Response, after which time the fee award will be decided on the papers.
Dated: March 27, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Colonies Partners, L.P. v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2020
Case No. 5:18-cv-00420-JGB (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Colonies Partners, L.P. v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:COLONIES PARTNERS, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. 5:18-cv-00420-JGB (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2020)

Citing Cases

S. Counties Oil Co. v. Henry

Also, Fuelco was under an independent obligation to preserve the hard drives. Colonies Partners, L.P. v.…

Roditi v. New River Invs.

(Id. at 5-6 (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(e) and Colonies Partners, L.P. v. County of San Bernardino, Case…