From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 24, 1997
701 A.2d 340 (Conn. 1997)

Opinion

Decided September 24, 1997


The Royal Insurance Company's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 558 (AC 15518/15519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (a)(2), and Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasion, 219 Conn. 764 (1991), the signature of the defendant, D. Eugene Bryant, was sufficient to render the reduction in coverage form effective as to him; and (2) the subsequent amendment to § 38-175c (a)(2), and codified at General Statutes § 38a-336 (a)(2), clarified § 38-175c (a)(2), with retroactive effect?"

BERDON, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15778.

Constance L. Epstein, in support of the petition.

Frederick L. Murolo and Jeffrey L. Fisher, in opposition.


Summaries of

Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 24, 1997
701 A.2d 340 (Conn. 1997)
Case details for

Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Bryant

Case Details

Full title:COLONIAL PENN INSURANCE COMPANY v. D. EUGENE BRYANT D. EUGENE BRYANT v…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 24, 1997

Citations

701 A.2d 340 (Conn. 1997)
701 A.2d 340

Citing Cases

Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. Bryant

We granted Royal's petition limited to the following issues: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that:…