From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colon v. Automatic Retailers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 27, 1973
74 Misc. 2d 665 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)

Opinion

July 27, 1973

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, ALLEN M. MYERS, J.

Mele Cullen ( Joseph D. Ahearn of counsel), for appellant.

Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz Damashek ( Lewis I. Wolf of counsel), for Victoria Colon, respondent.

Chadbourne, Parke, Whiteside Wolff ( Edward F. Hayes, III, Paul G. Pennoyer, Jr., and Frank A. Sherer, Jr., of counsel), for British Overseas Airways Corporation, respondent.


The introduction into evidence of photographs of the accident site showing subsequent alterations coupled with plaintiff's arguments that the lack of such alterations as of the date of the accident constituted negligence was prejudicial error. (See Cahill v. Kleinberg, 233 N.Y. 255; Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int., 60 Misc.2d 840.)

The award of judgment to British Overseas Airways Corporation on its cross claim for indemnification was improper in view of the lack of proof that the obligation for which indemnification was sought had been paid. (See Hevro Realty Co. v. Olaya, N YL.J., Aug. 6, 1971, p. 2, col. 1 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; 379 Madison Ave., Inc. v. Stuyvesant Co., 242 App. Div. 567, affd. 268 N.Y. 576.)

Judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant-appellant should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event. Judgment in favor of defendant British Overseas Airways Corporation on its cross claim against defendant-appellant reversed and cross claim should be dismissed as premature without prejudice, with $30 costs to appellant.

Concur — MARKOWITZ, P.J., LUPIANO and QUINN, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Colon v. Automatic Retailers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 27, 1973
74 Misc. 2d 665 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
Case details for

Colon v. Automatic Retailers

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA COLON, Respondent, v. AUTOMATIC RETAILERS ASSOCIATION SERVICE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 27, 1973

Citations

74 Misc. 2d 665 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
347 N.Y.S.2d 312

Citing Cases

Mead v. First Trust

The fixed percentage fee, therefore, is viewed only as a maximum fee, limiting the amount of reasonable…

Matter of Coastline Steel Prods

(Emphasis supplied.) What is more, it is to be observed that, "the debtor really [only] stands in the…