Summary
relying on the words "to result in" in subsection (c) and "to require" and "to provide" in subsection (d)
Summary of this case from Goldman v. Standard Ins. Co.Opinion
B142962
Filed May 31, 2001 REVIEW GRANTED
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
May 31, 2001
89 Cal.App.4th 778 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)
Summaries of
Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.
Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
May 31, 2001
89 Cal.App.4th 778 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)
relying on the words "to result in" in subsection (c) and "to require" and "to provide" in subsection (d)
Summary of this case from Goldman v. Standard Ins. Co.Case details for
Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:FRANCISCO COLMENARES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BRAEMAR COUNTRY CLUB…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Date published: May 31, 2001
Citations
89 Cal.App.4th 778 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 719
Citing Cases
Goldman v. Standard Ins. Co.
Id. at 1024 n. 2, 1030-31, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 662, 63 P.3d 220(noting, in construing whether FEHA required a…
Vaughan v. Jacobs & JacobsWhether or not these changes to FEHA apply retroactively is now before our Supreme Court. (Colmenares v.…