Collier v. Cty. of Los Angeles

Full title: Etta M. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 2008

296 F. App'x 594 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-55714.

Submitted October 6, 2008.^_

_ The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 15, 2008.

Etta M. Collier, Carson, CA, pro se.

Russell W. Chittenden, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Timothy J. Kral, Manning Marder, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01022-JFW.

Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^__

__ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and the response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees.

AFFIRMED.