From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Simpson

U.S.
Jan 21, 2003
537 U.S. 1159 (2003)

Summary

overruling the presumption that ERISA prevailing parties are entitled to a fee award

Summary of this case from Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

No. 02-744.

January 21, 2003.


C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 Fed. Appx. 251.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Simpson

U.S.
Jan 21, 2003
537 U.S. 1159 (2003)

overruling the presumption that ERISA prevailing parties are entitled to a fee award

Summary of this case from Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.
Case details for

Coleman v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:COLEMAN v. SIMPSON, TRUSTEE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 21, 2003

Citations

537 U.S. 1159 (2003)
123 S. Ct. 967

Citing Cases

Rittenhouse v. Unitedhealth Gr. Long Term Disability Ins. Plan

The district court has discretion to award attorney fees in ERISA actions. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g) (". . .…

Harley v. Minnesota Mining Manufacturing Company

None of those cases address the issue plaintiffs raise, which is whether the procedure for determining…