From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. North Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 26, 2021
No. 20-1899 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-1899

03-26-2021

RICHARD COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; PASQUOTANK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; ROBERT TRIVETTE; KATHERINE CARTWRIGHT; EDGAR BARNES, Defendants - Appellees.

Richard Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00350-RAJ-LRL) Before THACKER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Coleman appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for improper venue. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. North Carolina, No. 2:20-cv-00350-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. July 27, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We conclude that the district court's order dismissing Coleman's action without prejudice is an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that dismissal without prejudice may be final if no amendment to complaint can cure defect in plaintiff's complaint).

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Coleman v. North Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 26, 2021
No. 20-1899 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Coleman v. North Carolina

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD COLEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 26, 2021

Citations

No. 20-1899 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 2021)