From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-962 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-962 EFB P

07-09-2012

SAAHDI COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On May 18, 2012, the court found that plaintiff did not submit a certified copy of his trust account statement with his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the court ordered plaintiff to file a completed in forma pauperis application together with the required certified copy of his prison trust account statement. The order gave plaintiff 30 days to file the required application and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed.

The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice.

____________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Coleman v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-962 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Coleman v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:SAAHDI COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. RICK HILL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-962 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)