From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 2, 2010
Civil Action No. 09 - 1225 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 — 1225.

July 2, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On September 9, 2009, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on June 1, 2010 (doc. no. 12) recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that a certificate of appealability be denied. On June 21, 2010, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 13). Petitioner's objections do not undermine the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 12) dated June 1, 2010, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Coleman v. Folino

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 2, 2010
Civil Action No. 09 - 1225 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Coleman v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:DUANE LAMONT COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 2, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 - 1225 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

Gates v. Capozza

As a result, Respondent contends that "the general rule in federal habeas proceedings is that 'a federal…