From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Law

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 25, 1917
76 So. 995 (Ala. 1917)

Opinion

4 Div. 683.

November 25, 1917.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Coffee County; O. S. Lewis, Chancellor.

Action between Mary Cole and Malinda Law and others. From a decision in favor of the latter, the former appeals. Appeal dismissed.

J. A. Carnley, of Enterprise, for appellant.

W. L. Parks, of Andalusia, C. W. Simmons, of Enterprise, Claude Riley, of Elba, and M. S. Carmichael, of Montgomery, for appellees.


Appellant filed affidavit of inability to give security for costs, and that she is a married woman, the widow of Nathan Cole; but the court is of the opinion that Acts 1915, p. 715, amending section 2879, Code 1907, does not apply to this appeal. It is therefore ordered that, unless appellants give security for costs within 60 days from May 10, 1917, the appeal be dismissed. Appellants failing to give security as required, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Cole v. Law

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 25, 1917
76 So. 995 (Ala. 1917)
Case details for

Cole v. Law

Case Details

Full title:COLE v. LAW et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 25, 1917

Citations

76 So. 995 (Ala. 1917)
200 Ala. 697

Citing Cases

Peters v. Chas. Schuessler Sons

Acts 1915, p. 715. It is apparent the instant decree sought to be appealed from makes neither of the…

Ex Parte Barkley

However, the general proposition was laid down that "the change wrought by the amendatory act is no broader…