From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 19, 1959
272 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 16, Docket 25537.

Argued November 5, 1959.

Decided November 19, 1959.

Allen M. Mesirow, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Charles B.E. Freeman, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Robert N. Anderson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


The only ground assigned for review is that the Tax Court refused to enter orders of deficiency limited to the amounts stated in a stipulation prepared on behalf of the Commissioner during negotiations for settlement, signed by the taxpayer, but never signed or finally agreed to by the Commissioner. Under the circumstances we cannot see how the Commissioner may be limited in his recovery of deficiencies or estopped to claim them.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Cole v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 19, 1959
272 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Cole v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:Frank COLE, alias Frank Shapiro, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 1959

Citations

272 F.2d 13 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Dorchester Indus. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Two Ps argue that they never agreed to settle these cases and, even if they did, they have repudiated that…

Dorchester Indus. Inc. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Two Ps argue that they never agreed to settle these cases and, even if they did, they have repudiated that…