From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Dana

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1949
90 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Argued November 22, 1949

Decided December 29, 1949

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, MURPHY, J.

Jacob Lippman, Jacob R. Freund and Howard Hilton Spellman for appellants.

Paul W. Williams and John H. Clark for Karl H. Behr and others, respondents.

Horace G. Hitchcock, Frederick W. Wood and Melvin D. Goodman for Frederick M. Peyser and others, respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and BROMLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Dana

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1949
90 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

Cohen v. Dana

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN W. COHEN et al., Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 29, 1949

Citations

90 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1949)
90 N.E.2d 65

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Public Administrator

With its disappearance, New York law will have arrived at a modern and stable statement of the law of res…

Ordway v. White

The requirement of mutuality of estoppel has been virtually abandoned by these cases, and the right of…