From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofone v. Cofone

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 1, 1948
61 A.2d 751 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1948 —

Decided November 1, 1948.

Mr. Samuel Levin argued the cause for the defendant-appellant ( Mr. Jack L. Holstein, attorney). Mr. Robert D. Grosman argued the cause and with Mr. Charles M. Grosman filed a brief for the petitioner-respondent.


We concur in the result. The evidence supports the finding that there was a wilful and continued desertion of the respondent by the appellant, and the decree therefore is affirmed.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal: None.


Summaries of

Cofone v. Cofone

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 1, 1948
61 A.2d 751 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Cofone v. Cofone

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH COFONE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. CARMELA COFONE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 1, 1948

Citations

61 A.2d 751 (N.J. 1948)
61 A.2d 751

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

Scharf v. Recorder's Court, 1 N.J. 59, 61 A.2d 765 (1948). Cofone v. Cofone, 1 N.J. 58, 61 A.2d 751 (1948).…