From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coffman v. Robert J. Young Company, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 14, 2011
NO. 3:10-1052 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 3:10-1052.

June 14, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 23) that Defendant Robert J. Young Company, Inc.'s motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 14) should be denied in part and granted in part. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the motion be denied with respect to Plaintiff's ADA discrimination claim and granted with respect to Plaintiff's FMLA claims.

After de novo review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and the Defendant's motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's ADA discrimination claim and GRANTED as to Plaintiff's FMLA claims.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), this action is referred to the Honorable John Bryant, Magistrate Judge to hear and determine any pretrial motion, including discovery matters, to conduct any necessary conferences and hearings and to submit a report and recommendation for disposition of any motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12, 15, 56 and 65.

It is so ORDERED. ENTERED this the 13th day of June, 2011.


Summaries of

Coffman v. Robert J. Young Company, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 14, 2011
NO. 3:10-1052 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Coffman v. Robert J. Young Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE A. COFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J. YOUNG COMPANY, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jun 14, 2011

Citations

NO. 3:10-1052 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2011)

Citing Cases

Rico v. Xcel Energy, Inc.

Jan. 12, 2012) (holding that, under the broader definition of disability set forth in the ADAAA, Plaintiff's…