From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cody v. O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1986
116 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 21, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

Special Term arrived at an apportionment of the attorney's fees in this action after conducting a hearing at which it had ample opportunity to evaluate the evidence and assess the credibility of witnesses as well as to consider the experience and background of counsel and the quantity, quality and effectiveness of the legal work performed (see, Matter of Tillman, 259 N.Y. 133, 136). Upon review of the record, there is no basis upon which to conclude that the sum awarded constituted other than fair and reasonable compensation (cf. Sammon v Green, 63 A.D.2d 872). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cody v. O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1986
116 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Cody v. O'Neill

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CODY et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH O'NEILL et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Warren v. Meyers

It is within the sound discretion of this court to determine the reasonable percentage of attorney's fees to…

Warren v. Meyers

It is within the sound discretion of this court to determine the reasonable percentage of attorneys fees to…